RegulonDB

Gene
Name:	djlB
Synonym(s):	ECK0639, G6353, b0646, ybeS
Genome position(nucleotides):	677415 --> 678842 Genome Browser
Strand:	forward
Sequence:	Get nucleotide sequence FastaFormat
GC content %:	47.48
External database links:

ASAP:	ABE-0002210
ECHOBASE:	EB3413
OU-MICROARRAY:	b0646
PortEco:	djlB
STRING:	511145.b0646
COLOMBOS:	djlB

Product

Name:

J domain-containing protein DjlB

Synonym(s):

DjlB, YbeS

Sequence:

Get amino acid sequence Fasta Format

Cellular location:

inner membrane,cytosol

Molecular weight:

55.256

Isoelectric point:

4.673

Motif(s):

Type	Positions	Sequence
	3 -> 70	NCWKILDIEETTDVDIIRRAYLALLPSFHPETDPQGFKQLRQAYEEALRIAQSPAKSVWQPEEYEVAE
	453 -> 474	IIKIIFYIFIFAGLIGKILHLF

Classification:

Multifun Terms (GenProtEC)
Multifun Terms (GenProtEC)		2 - information transfer --> 2.3 - protein related --> 2.3.4 - chaperoning, repair (refolding)
Gene Ontology Terms (GO)
Gene Ontology Terms (GO)	cellular_component	GO:0005829 - cytosol GO:0005887 - integral component of plasma membrane

Note(s):

Note(s): ...[more].

Evidence:

[HIFS] Human inference of function from sequence

Reference(s):

[1] Itoh T., et al., 1999

External database links:

ECOCYC:

ECOLIWIKI:

INTERPRO:

INTERPRO:

PRIDE:

PROSITE:

REFSEQ:

SMART:

SMR:

UNIPROT:

Operon

Name:

ybeR-djlB

Operon arrangement:

Transcription unit	Promoter

Elements in the selected gene context region unrelated to any object in RegulonDB

Type	Name	Post Left	Strand	Notes	Evidence (Confirmed, Strong, Weak)	References
promoter	ybeRp7	676560	forward	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: high homology. Score: 5.935. P-value: 6.315e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]
promoter	ybeQp5	676572	reverse	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: poor homology. Score: 2.624. P-value: 5.714e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]
promoter	ybeRp5	676590	forward	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: high homology. Score: 4.11. P-value: 4.540e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]
promoter	ybeQp12	676611	reverse	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: high homology. Score: 4.258. P-value: 5.328e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]
promoter	ybeQp10	676624	reverse	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: poor homology. Score: 3.545. P-value: 6.705e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]
promoter	ybeRp6	676637	forward	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: high homology. Score: 5.216. P-value: 4.406e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]
promoter	ybeQp8	676639	reverse	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: good homology. Score: 3.263. P-value: 6.910e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]
promoter	ybeQp11	676700	reverse	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: high homology. Score: 4.1. P-value: 2.517e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]
promoter	ybeQp1	676706	reverse	Similarity to the consensus sequence of the set of known functional promoters for this sigma factor with strong experimental evidence: poor homology. Score: -2.24. P-value: 3.754e-5 Read more >	[ICWHO]	[2]

Evidence
[ICWHO] Inferred computationally without human oversight

Reference(s)
[1] Itoh T., Matsuda H., Mori H., 1999, Phylogenetic analysis of the third hsp70 homolog in Escherichia coli; a novel member of the Hsc66 subfamily and its possible co-chaperone., DNA Res 6(5):299-305
[2] Huerta AM., Collado-Vides J., 2003, Sigma70 promoters in Escherichia coli: specific transcription in dense regions of overlapping promoter-like signals., J Mol Biol 333(2):261-78