|
|
| Operon |  |
|---|---|
| Name: | manXYZ |
| This page displays every known transcription unit of this operon and their known regulation. | |
| Name: | manXYZ | |||||||||
| Synonym(s): | OP00275, ptsX | |||||||||
| Gene(s): | manX, manY, manZ Genome Browser M3D Gene expression COLOMBOS | |||||||||
| Note(s): | The plasticity of the promoter regions was demonstrated for two CRP target genes, ptsG and manX. Four genetically different strains with the crp gene deleted were propagated in a glucose minimal medium, the crp gene. This deletion led to deleterious effects on growth in the four strains, but most of the populations quickly evolved compensatory changes that restored fast growth and were specific to the glucose environment in which they evolved. The adaptation involved plasticity of the promoter regions of two CRP target genes involved in glucose transport, ptsG and manX 30825312 | |||||||||
| Reference(s): |
[1] Plumbridge J. 1998 [2] Plumbridge J., et al., 1991 [3] Plumbridge J., et al., 1995 |
|||||||||
| Promoter | ||||||||||
| Name: | manXp | |||||||||
| +1: | 1901933 | |||||||||
| Sigma Factor: | Sigma70 Sigmulon | |||||||||
| Distance from start of the gene: | 115 | |||||||||
| Sequence: |
gaaagttaaattacggatcttcatcacataaaataattttttcgatatctaaaataaatcGcgaaacgcaggggtttttgg -35 -10 +1 |
|||||||||
| Note(s): | The homology with the consensus -35 sequences is poor, but it has been noted that the lack of a good -35 sequences is a characteristic of positively regulated genes Plumbridge J.,1998. | |||||||||
| Evidence: |
[HIPP] [ICWHO] [TIM] |
|||||||||
| Reference(s): |
[4] Huerta AM., et al., 2003 [1] Plumbridge J. 1998 |
|||||||||
| Type | Transcription factor | Function | Promoter | Binding Sites | Growth Conditions | Evidence (Confirmed, Strong, Weak) | Reference(s) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeftPos | RightPos | Central Rel-Pos | Sequence | |||||||
| proximal | CRP-cAMP1 | activator | manXp | 1901830 | 1901851 | -92.5 | ctttgcaaacGAATGTGACAAGGATATTTTACCtttcgaaatt | nd | [AIBSCS], [APIORCISFBSCS], [GEA] | [2], [7] |
| proximal | CRP-cAMP2 | activator | manXp | 1901882 | 1901903 | -40.5 | cgaaagttaaATTACGGATCTTCATCACATAAAataatttttt | nd | [APIORCISFBSCS], [BCE], [GEA] | [1], [2] |
| Type | Transcription factor | Function | Promoter | Binding Sites | Growth Conditions | Evidence (Confirmed, Strong, Weak) | Reference(s) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeftPos | RightPos | Central Rel-Pos | Sequence | |||||||
| proximal | Mlc1 | repressor | manXp | 1901843 | 1901865 | -79.0 | tgtgacaaggATATTTTACCTTTCGAAATTTCTGctaatcgaaa | nd | [BCE], [GEA] | [1] |
| proximal | Mlc2 | repressor | manXp | 1901909 | 1901931 | -13.0 | cataaaataaTTTTTTCGATATCTAAAATAAATCgcgaaacgca | nd | [BCE], [GEA] | [1] |
| Type | Transcription factor | Function | Promoter | Binding Sites | Growth Conditions | Evidence (Confirmed, Strong, Weak) | Reference(s) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeftPos | RightPos | Central Rel-Pos | Sequence | |||||||
| proximal | NagC1 | repressor | manXp | 1901842 | 1901864 | -80.0 | atgtgacaagGATATTTTACCTTTCGAAATTTCTgctaatcgaa | nd | [AIBSCS], [APIORCISFBSCS], [BCE], [GEA] | [1], [2] |
| proximal | NagC2 | repressor | manXp | 1901925 | 1901947 | 4.0 | cgatatctaaAATAAATCGCGAAACGCAGGGGTTtttggttgta | nd | [BCE], [GEA] | [1], [2] |
| Note(s): |
1This second very weak CAP site upstream from manX in the region -80 to -100 is detected only at very high CAP concentrations Plumbridge J,1991. Zheng D,2004. 2A Class II promoter. CAP and NagC can bind simultaneously and produce a complex more stable than the binary NagC-DNA complex Plumbridge J.,1998.1A mutation in the mlc gene, encoding a homolog of nagC, results in a threefold derepression of manX expression, suggesting that this protein is a more important regulator of maX expression than NagC. The Mlc protein binds to the NagC operators, binding preferentially to the promoter-proximal operator. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the Mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect with the Mlc protein is stronger. Mcl weakly protects this operator. The manX operator is only partially occupied under physiological concentrations of the Mlc protein. CAP and NagC can bind simultaneously and produce a complex more stable than the binary NagC-DNA complex Plumbridge J.,1998. 2A mutation in the mlc gene, encoding a homolog of nagC, results in a threefold derepression of manX expression, suggesting that this protein is a more important regulator of maX expression than NagC. The Mlc protein binds to the NagC operators, binding preferentially to the promoter-proximal operator. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect to the Mlc protein is stronger. Mcl weakly protects this operator. The manX operator is only partially occupied under physiological concentrations of the Mlc protein. CAP and NagC can bind simultaneously and produce a complex more stable than the binary NagC-DNA complex Plumbridge J.,1998.1Previously, two binding sites for the NagC repressor were detected upstream from manX, but a mutation in nagC had very little effect on manX expression. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the Mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect on the Mlc protein is stronger. NagC binds more tightly to the -79 position than to the -13 position Plumbridge J,1991. Plumbridge J.,1998. 2Previously, two binding sites for the NagC repressor were detected upstream of manX, but a mutation in nagC has very little effect on manX expression. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the Mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect of the Mlc protein is stronger Plumbridge J.,1998. Plumbridge J,1991.1This second very weak CAP site upstream from manX in the region -80 to -100 is detected only at very high CAP concentrations Plumbridge J,1991. Zheng D,2004. 2Previously, two binding sites for the NagC repressor were detected upstream from manX, but a mutation in nagC had very little effect on manX expression. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the Mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect on the Mlc protein is stronger. NagC binds more tightly to the -79 position than to the -13 position Plumbridge J,1991. Plumbridge J.,1998. 3A mutation in the mlc gene, encoding a homolog of nagC, results in a threefold derepression of manX expression, suggesting that this protein is a more important regulator of maX expression than NagC. The Mlc protein binds to the NagC operators, binding preferentially to the promoter-proximal operator. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the Mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect with the Mlc protein is stronger. Mcl weakly protects this operator. The manX operator is only partially occupied under physiological concentrations of the Mlc protein. CAP and NagC can bind simultaneously and produce a complex more stable than the binary NagC-DNA complex Plumbridge J.,1998. 4A Class II promoter. CAP and NagC can bind simultaneously and produce a complex more stable than the binary NagC-DNA complex Plumbridge J.,1998. 5A mutation in the mlc gene, encoding a homolog of nagC, results in a threefold derepression of manX expression, suggesting that this protein is a more important regulator of maX expression than NagC. The Mlc protein binds to the NagC operators, binding preferentially to the promoter-proximal operator. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect to the Mlc protein is stronger. Mcl weakly protects this operator. The manX operator is only partially occupied under physiological concentrations of the Mlc protein. CAP and NagC can bind simultaneously and produce a complex more stable than the binary NagC-DNA complex Plumbridge J.,1998. 6Previously, two binding sites for the NagC repressor were detected upstream of manX, but a mutation in nagC has very little effect on manX expression. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the Mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect of the Mlc protein is stronger Plumbridge J.,1998. Plumbridge J,1991. |
| Reference(s) |
|
|---|---|
[HIPP] Human inference of promoter position